Allowed

Smt Naini v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC25 Feb 2019BAIL/7947/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant, Smt. Naini, charged with causing grievous hurt and attempt to murder. It found her a fit case for bail at that stage, imposing conditions to cooperate in the trial, avoid tampering with evidence, and refrain from unlawful activities, subject to standard period.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions of cooperation and non-tampering.

Smt Naini Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 45

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7947 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Smt Naini Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Dulare Singh,Mayank Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Harsh Kumar,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶6

Learned counsel for applicant contended that applicant has been falsely implicated being second wife of main culprit Pappu; that as per averments made in F.I.R., Smt. Moharshree was first wife of co-accused Pappu and since she was not blessed with any child, Pappu made second marriage with applicant and applicant allegedly joined Pappu in causing her burn injuries after pouring kerosene on her; that in her statement under section 164 Cr.P.C., victim Smt. Moharshree has assigned the role of pouring kerosene and causing burn injuries only to coaccused Pappu and applicant is not alleged to have joined him in above criminal act; that case of applicant is distinguishable from co-accused Pappu; that applicant has no criminal history; that applicant undertakes that she will not misuse liberty of bail; that applicant is in custody since 4.1.2019.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of bail.

¶8

Upon hearing learned counsel and perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

¶9

Let the applicant Smt Naini be released on bail in Case Crime No.02 of 2019, under Sections 307, 326A IPC, P.S.Nibohara, District Agra on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-

¶10

(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed for framing of charge, recording of evidence as well as recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. or through counsel on other dates and in case of absence without sufficient cause, it will be deemed that she is abusing the liberty of bail enabling the court

¶11

concerned to take necessary action in accordance with the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. or Sections 174A and 229A I.P.C.

¶12

(ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶13

(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.

¶14

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶15

Order Date :- 25.2.2019 Tamang

Smt Naini v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Naini v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brijesh Saroj and Another Vs State of U.P.

Than Singh Vs State of U.P.

Laddu @ Dilip Kumar Madhesiya Vs State of U.P.

Shyam Balak Ram Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Smt Maharani Vs State of U.P.

Lalchandra Nishad Vs State of U.P.