Allowed

Sakir @ Sabir v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Aug 2019BAIL/28733/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was allowed for Sakir @ Sabir accused under various sections of IPC and C.L.A. Act 1985. The court found it a fit case for bail without expressing an opinion on merits, releasing him on a personal bond with two sureties subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Accused released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties in the like amount.

Sakir @ Sabir Vs State of U.P. — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28733 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Sakir @ Sabir Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satish Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Sakir @ Sabir in connection with Case Crime No.0459 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 352, 353, 336, 436, 427 I.P.C. & 7 Criminal Law Amendment Act, P.S. Murad Nagar, District Ghaziabad.

¶7

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that there is allegation in the first information report that the applicant along with other co-accused of members of public had blocked the road and did illegal activities and the public at large had suffered a lot and also indulged in offences against the public order. He further submitted that no specific role has been assigned to the applicant. He further submitted that all the accused persons has been assigned the general role. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 09.06.2019 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶9

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶10

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Sakir @ Sabir involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶13

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;

¶14

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶15

iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;

¶16

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts

¶17

to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. Order Date :- 26.8.2019

¶18

R./

Sakir @ Sabir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakir @ Sabir v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dev Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Raja Babu Vs State of U.P.

Farman Vs State of U.P.

Issue Vs State of U.P.

Nazmul Hasan Khan Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Babita Vs State of U.P.