Allowed

Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2019BAIL/28356/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge court considered bail for an applicant accused of crime No.03 of 2019 under various IPC sections. After hearing counsel, the court held it was a fit case for bail despite opposing submissions and allowed the plea with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail upon executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties in the like amount, subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence, threaten witnesses, and appear in court.

Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28356 of 2019 Applicant :- Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶2

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

¶4

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh in connection with Case Crime No.03 of 2019, under Sections 386, 323, 504, 506 and 325 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Kalpi, District Jalaun.

¶5

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that it has been mentioned in the first information report that the applicant along with co-accused had committed marpit with lathi and axe but no injury of axe was found on the person of injured. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.06.2019 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶7

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶8

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not pressurize the victim or his family members during trial.

¶11

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;

¶12

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶13

iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;

¶14

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 17.7.2019

¶16

R./

Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kale Vs State of U.P.

Karmendra Singh Chauhan @ Tinku Vs State of U.P.

Ram Aasare Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Dauji Vs State of U.P.

Dushyant Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P.

Abhinav Yadav Vs State of U.P.