Allowed

Dushyant Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC17 Jul 2019BAIL/24261/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 IPC, the Hon'ble Court allowed the plea and ordered the applicant's release on personal bond with two sureties conditioned to not tamper with evidence or forge machinery, appearing as required.

What did the court decide?

Ordering the applicant to be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court.

Dushyant Kumar Sharma Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24261 of 2019 Applicant :- Dushyant Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pushpendra Singh

¶2

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶3

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned A.G.A.

¶4

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant Dushyant Kumar Sharma in connection with Case Crime No.1297 of 2017, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Anoopshahar, District Bulandshahr.

¶5

The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case with the ulterior motive. He submitted that the applicant is alleged to be a witness of the agreement to sale, which was executed by the husband of the complainant. He submitted that all the offences are triable by the court of Magistrate. He submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 14.05.2019 and in case, he is released on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶7

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused, but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶8

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Dushyant Kumar Sharma involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶11

ii) The applicant shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses;

¶12

iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶13

iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission;

¶14

v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 17.7.2019

¶16

R./

Dushyant Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dushyant Kumar Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kale Vs State of U.P.

Karmendra Singh Chauhan @ Tinku Vs State of U.P.

Ram Aasare Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Dauji Vs State of U.P.

Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh Vs State of U.P.

Abhinav Yadav Vs State of U.P.