Allowed

Tejvir @ Buddhi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC24 Jul 2019BAIL/28202/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 394 and 411 IPC filed by Tejvir @ Buddhi, the Court found it to be a fit case for bail, allowing the applicant release on personal bond and sureties subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail in connection with Case Crime No. 419 of 2018 by furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Tejvir @ Buddhi Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28202 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Tejvir @ Buddhi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 419 of 2018 under Sections 394 and 411 I.P.C., P.S. Mant, District Mathura.

¶7

The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused was not named in the FIR. He is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He further submitted that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the present applicant or on his pointing out. He next submitted that the alleged recovery which has been shown is totally false and fake. No proper identification of the accused was conducted by the police to ascertain the real culprits. Offence is triable by the Court of Magistrate.

¶8

He has placed reliance in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22 . The accused is languishing in jail since 11.12.2018 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶10

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant Tejvir @ Buddhi be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following

¶13

conditions:-

¶14

i) The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶15

ii) The applicant will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶16

iii) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶17

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 24.7.2019 Shanu

Tejvir @ Buddhi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tejvir @ Buddhi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Khandelwal Vs State of U.P.

Anmol Singh Vs State of U.P.

Bhulan Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Narendra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Gopal Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Natthu Vs State of U.P.