Allowed

Anmol Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Jul 2019BAIL/18437/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the applicant pleaded innocence and relied on the liberation of a co-accused. The Court held it a fit case for bail, allowing the application subject to personal bond, sureties, and specific conditions to ensure trial cooperation and prevent tampering.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to cooperation, non-tampering with witnesses, and no illegal activities.

Anmol Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18437 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Anmol Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Shukla,Kamal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dhirendra Srivastava

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 03 of 2019 under Sections 386, 323, 504 & 506 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Kalpi, District Jalaun.

¶7

The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He further submitted that the co-accused Rishabh Singh @ Akshay Singh who was having similar role, has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 17.07.2019 passed by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 28356 of 2019.

¶8

He has placed reliance in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22 . The accused is languishing in jail since 05.01.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶10

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant Anmol Singh be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶13

i) The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the

¶14

trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶15

ii) The applicant will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶16

iii) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶17

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 23.7.2019 Shanu

Anmol Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anmol Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Brijesh Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Banti @ Nasir Vs State of U.P.

Satendra Nishad Vs State of U.P.

Raj Kumar Khandelwal Vs State of U.P.

Bhulan Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Anuj Shukla Vs State of U.P.