It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. False and fabricated prosecution story has been made by the police. There is no reliable evidence against the applicant. It is next argued that in the gang chart, two cases are shown against the accusedapplicant. It has further been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in both the cases shown in the gang-chart, copies of the bail orders have been enclosed as Annexure-3 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. Apart from the criminal cases shown in the gang chart, the applicant has also criminal history of 12 other cases, but the same have satisfactorily been explained in supplementary affidavit. It is next contended that there is no possibility of the applicant of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, the applicant shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 28th September, 2015. As such the applicant has undergone more than 4 years of incarceration.
