Allowed

Anand Shukla and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jun 2019BAIL/24851/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted bail to accused applicants Anand Shukla and Madhuri Shukla involved in case Crime No. 187 of 2015 under various IPC sections, relying on parity with bail granted to co-accused persons in similar facts and the nature of the offences, without touching merits.

What did the court decide?

Accused applicants released on bail upon furnishing personal bond and two sureties each with specified conditions.

Anand Shukla and Another Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 46

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24851 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Anand Shukla And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Vijay Kumar Rai

¶4

Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A and gone through the record.

¶7

This bail application has been moved on behalf of accusedapplicants 1. Anand Shukla and 2. Madhuri Shukla , who are involved in case crime no. 187 of 2015 under Section 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 308, 304 I.P.C., Police Station- Paikoliya, District-Basti.

¶8

Submission of learned counsel for the applicants is that in the similar set of facts, in respect to the same occurrence coaccused Nidhi Shukla and Neelam Shukla have been provided bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 24.11.2017 and 29.11.2017 in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.45541of 2017 and Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.46669 of 2017 respectively, claiming parity, pleading false implication it is lastly contended that the accused applicants are languishing in jail since 06.06.2019.

¶9

Learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail. However granting bail to co-accused persons and parity has not been disputed.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without touching the merits of the case in my opinion the accused applicants are entitled for bail.

¶11

Let the above named applicants involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶12

The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence, shall cooperate in investigation or trial and shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime

¶13

after being released on bail.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicants and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶15

Order Date :- 20.6.2019//Fhd.

Anand Shukla and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anand Shukla and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mursaleen Vs State of U.P.

Kamal Jeet Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Haleem @ Pathan Vs State of U.P.

Ram Khiladi@Ram Niwas Vs State of Up

Raja @ Ishtiyaq Vs State of U.P.

Taufeeq Vs State of U.P.