Allowed

Raja @ Ishtiyaq v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jun 2019BAIL/24734/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Supreme Court Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 24734 of 2019, where the Hon'ble Court allowed bail to Raja @ Ishtiyaq in a case involving theft and criminal breach of trust, punishable under Sections 379 and 411 IPC, subject to standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Raja @ Ishtiyaq is released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties subject to standard conditions.

Raja @ Ishtiyaq Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 46

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24734 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Raja @ Ishtiyaq Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jagdish Prasad Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed which is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

This bail application has been filed by the applicant Raja @ Ishtiyaq seeking bail in Case Crime No. 201 of 2019, under Sections 379, 411 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Moradabad.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; he further submitted that nothing has been recovered from his possession and there is no eye witness of the alleged recovery; Offence is triable by the Magistrate; submission is that the coaccused, Mohd. Shahid @ Wakeel, has already been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this court vide order dated 19.06.2019 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 24752 of 2019. The applicant is in jail since 14.3.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but could not dispute the parity as claimed by learned counsel for the applicant.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, severity of punishment, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail.

¶11

Let the applicant- Raja @ Ishtiyaq be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions :-

¶12

(i)The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶14

(iii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶15

(iv) The applicant shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.

¶16

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it will be open to the opposite parties to approach the Court for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Order Date :- 20.6.2019 Rohit

Raja @ Ishtiyaq v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja @ Ishtiyaq v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mursaleen Vs State of U.P.

Kamal Jeet Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Haleem @ Pathan Vs State of U.P.

Ram Khiladi@Ram Niwas Vs State of Up

Anand Shukla and Another Vs State of U.P.

Taufeeq Vs State of U.P.