Allowed

Vishal Kaushik v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Jul 2019BAIL/24089/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Coram Single Judge of Court No. 80 allowed Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 24089 of 2019. The court held it to be a fit case for bail considering facts, circumstances, nature of allegations, and gravity of offence, ordering release on personal bond and sureties subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on bail with personal bond and two reliable sureties, each of like amount.

Vishal Kaushik Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 24089 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Vishal Kaushik Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satish Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 44 of 2019, under Sections 395, 412 & 149 I.P.C., P.S. Lal Kurti, District Meerut.

¶7

The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused is not named in the F.I.R. The accused is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He submitted that the alleged recovery of 900 grams of gold is totally false and fake as there is no public witness of the alleged recovery. He further submitted that no proper identification of the accused was conducted to ascertain the real culprits after his arrest. He further submitted that the co-accused Hemant Kumar who was having similar role, has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 22.07.2019 passed by this Bench in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 29135 of 2019.

¶8

He has placed reliance in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22 . The accused is languishing in jail since 03.03.2019 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶10

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant Vishal Kaushik be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond

¶13

and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶14

i) The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶15

ii) The applicant will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶16

iii) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶17

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 26.7.2019

¶20

Shanu

Vishal Kaushik v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vishal Kaushik v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suny Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Manpreet Singh @ Kake Vs State of U.P.

Arif Iqbal Fansopkar Vs State of U.P.

Raghubar Bind Vs State of U.P.

Manish Vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Babu Vs State of U.P.