Allowed

Manpreet Singh @ Kake v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC25 Jul 2019BAIL/15598/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a bail application filed by Manpreet Singh @ Kake in a case under the Gangster Act, 1986, finding it a fit case for bail without expressing an opinion on merits based on the overall circumstances.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail forthwith, subject to personal bond, two sureties, and specific conditions including attendance and non-tampering.

Manpreet Singh @ Kake Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 80

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15598 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Manpreet Singh @ Kake Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Singh,Prakash Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

This is a bail application on behalf of the applicant in connection with Case Crime No. 61 of 2018, under Sections 2/3 Gangster Act, 1986, P.S. Puranpur, District Pilibhit.

¶7

The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the accused is absolutely innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. He submitted that according to the Gangchart, 17 cases has been registered against the present accused and he has been granted bail in all the cases. He next submitted that the co-accused Kuldeep Singh and Shivjeet Singh Alias Shibboo who were having similar role, have already been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 29.10.2018 & 03.12.2018 passed by the another Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 34848 of 2018 and 37805 of 2018.

¶8

He has placed reliance in the case of Data Ram Vs. State of U.P. and others, 2018(3) SCC 22 . The accused is languishing in jail since 15.02.2018 and in case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial.

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail plea.

¶10

Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence, the severity of the punishment, the evidence appearing against the accused but without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail.

¶11

Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed .

¶12

Let the applicant Manpreet Singh @ Kake be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal

¶13

bond and two reliable sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶14

i) The applicant will continue to attend and co-operate in the trial pending before the court concerned on the date fixed after release.

¶15

ii) The applicant will not tamper with the witnesses.

¶16

iii) The applicant will not indulge in any illegal activities during the bail period.

¶17

It is further directed that the identity, status and residence proof of the sureties be verified by the authorities concerned before they are accepted.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶19

Order Date :- 25.7.2019

¶20

Shanu

Manpreet Singh @ Kake v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manpreet Singh @ Kake v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Narendra Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Gopal Gupta Vs State of U.P.

Tejvir @ Buddhi Vs State of U.P.

Sanju Vs State of U.P.

Suny Kumar Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Arif Iqbal Fansopkar Vs State of U.P.