It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that as per allegation in the FIR the victim stays in a rented house which belongs to the applicant Jaheer. On 03.03.2019 when the victim Aisha was all alone at her house, at about 12 o'clock the applicant entered into the house and sexually assaulted her. It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the incident is of 03.03.2019 whereas the first information report has been lodged after a delay of three days, i.e. on 06.06.2019 without giving any plausible explanation for the same which makes the prosecution story doubtful. It is next argued that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case as there was some dispute regarding rent between the parties. It is further stated that other siblings were present outside her house when the victim was all alone in her house and one more family was also staying on rent when the incident took place. In her statement before the doctor she has stated that the applicant had injected the victim with some drug and had sexually assaulted her after threatening for life. There are variations in the statements of the victim given before the doctor and under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the applicant has pressed the bail application on the ground that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case on account of some dispute regarding rent between the parties. It is next contended that the applicant has no criminal history and there is no possibility of fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and the applicant is languishing in jail since 07.03.2019. Accordingly, he requests for bail.
