Vimla Devi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Second bail application rejected despite applicant being mother-in-law of deceased. Court directed trial to conclude expeditiously under Section 309 Cr.P.C.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; trial directed to conclude expeditiously with coercive measures for witness appearance.
What the court decided
Court No. - 51
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 18346 of 2019
Applicant :- Vimla Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Chandra Solanki,Mahendra Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vipin Sinha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A. G. A. for the State.
Applicant has moved the present second bail application seeking bail in Case Crime No.441 of 2016 u/s 498A, 304B IPC and 3/4 DP Act PS Dibiyapur District Auraiya. The first bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 27.3.2017.
Contention in the second bail application is that the applicant is the mother-in-law of the deceased. Further contention is that the applicant is in jail since 16.12.2016 and the trial is not progressing.
I have perused the FIR, post mortem report and the bail rejection order passed by this Court.
Perusal of the record shows that the cause of death is strangulation. It has not been disputed that the husband was not present at the time of the incident. Further, no subsequent development or any new ground has been brought on record.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant who is the mother-in-law of the deceased in a case involving sections 498A and 304B IPC.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vimla Devi
Coram
Vipin Sinha
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/18346/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court