It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. As per the allegation in the F.I.R., on information received by the informer, when the Police made a raid in the field of sugarcane then the applicant was arrested on the spot, who was engaged in the manufacturing of illicit liquor and upon search, 10 ltrs. adulterated liquor, urea and other articles were recovered from the spot. It is next argued that the recovery shown by the Police is false and planted and is not supported by any independent witness. Though the applicant was arrested from the spot but has nothing to do with the alleged recovery. It is further argued that there is nothing on record to show that the alleged recovered illicit liquor was either noxious or dangerous to public health or life. It is further argued that the applicant has criminal history of five cases, which has been explained in paragraph no.02 of the supplementary affidavit in support of bail application, because of which the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some undue consideration by the police personnel. The applicant is languishing in jail since 17.02.2019. In case, he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial by all means. Lastly, it is submitted that there is no chance of applicant fleeing away from judicial process or tampering with the witnesses.
