Allowed

Sujit Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Apr 2019BAIL/13408/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Misc. Bail Application where the applicant, claiming false implication and potential trial delays, sought release. The court granted bail subject to specific conditions including a personal bond, two sureties, and strict restrictions against tampering with witnesses or committing further crimes.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties subject to conditions regarding witness tampering, cooperation in trial, and refraining from criminal activity.

Sujit Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 42

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13408 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Sujit Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishna Pratap Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶6

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart the applicant is said to have been involved in three criminal cases in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. He has falsely been implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not a member of any gang. There is no prospect of trial of the present case being concluded in near future due to heavy dockets. The applicant is not a previous convict. The applicant is languishing in jail since 30.11.2018 and in case he is enlarged on bail he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the applicant is a member of gang and habitual of committing crime. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar anti-social activities and will misuse the bail by extending threat and intimidation to the prosecution witnesses.

¶8

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, let the applicant Sujit Kumar, involved in case crime No. 782 of 2018, under Section 3(1) of UP Gangster and Anti Social Activities Prevention Act, PS Shivpur, district Varanasi, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶9

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing

¶10

the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶11

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶12

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶13

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶14

Order Date :- 8.4.2019 Ishrat

Sujit Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sujit Kumar Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalpana Gupta Vs State of U.P. and Another

Abdul Azeez @ Azeem Vs State of U.P. and Another

Om Prakash Vs State of U.P.

Harish Chandra and 2 Ors. Vs State of U.P.

Javed Kuraishi Vs State of U.P.

Charan Singh Yadav Vs State of U.P.