Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. The applicant is not named in the F.I.R. He has not committed any offence. He further submitted that it appears from the statement of victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C before the Magistrate concerned, victim went with accused-applicant with her own sweet will. As per radiological examination, age of victim was found about 19 years. She remained with accused-applicant for some days, later on she came back to her parental house. She appears to be a consenting party. She refused to take her internal examination before doctor, therefore, she was not medically examined. He next contended that under the presser of her parents, victim has given statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. against the accusedapplicant. He further argued that in case the applicant is enlarged on bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.1.2019.
