Mohan v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court granted bail to Mohan in a criminal complaint case regarding fraudulent execution of a sale deed, subject to conditions against tampering with evidence and commission of new crimes.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted with personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
What the court decided
Court No. - 22 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10492 of 2019 Applicant :- Mohan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rabindra Bahadur Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Kumar,J.
Applicant- Mohan seeks bail in Complaint Case No. 105, under Sections 406,420,467,468 IPC , Police Station Khair, District Aligarh.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri N.K. Singh and Sri A.P.Singh, learned counsel for complainant and learned AGA for the State.
It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is only marginal witness of the sale deed and is not a beneficiary. It has been further submitted that applicant has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 07.02.2019.
Bail has been opposed by learned AGA and learned Counsel for the complainant stating that sale deed has been executed fraudulently by person who is not the owner of the property in question.
The points pertaining to nature of accusation, severity of punishment, reasonable apprehension of tampering the witnesses, prima facie, satisfaction regarding proposed evidence and genuineness of the prosecution case were duly considered.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the above mentioned applicant involved in aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohan
Coram
Umesh Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/10492/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court