Application filed under Section 482 was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one responded on behalf of the applicants despite repeated calls.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 64
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9326 of 2019
Applicant :- Chandni @ Hina And 3 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Jaki Ahmad,Sanjay Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
On the matter being taken up, no one responds on behalf of the applicants despite repeated calls. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 is present.
It appears that in this case, the applicants are enjoying interim order granted by this Court and is not interested in pursuing their legal remedy.
Hence, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, granted by this Court stands vacated.
Order Date :- 22.5.2019
Raj
Chandni @ Hina And 3 Ors
Arvind Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
