Sazid @ Shaid @ Jaddu v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application for want of prosecution as no appearance was made by the applicant to press the plea.
The High Court dismissed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application for want of prosecution as no appearance was made by the applicant to press the plea.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5354 of 2010
Applicant :- Sazid @ Shaid @ Jaddu Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- G.C. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this 482 Cr.P.C. application.
Smt. Poonam Singh Sengar, learned AGA for the State is present.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 15.5.2019 Dev/-
Sazid @ Shaid @ Jaddu
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court