Abdul Raoof v. State of U.P. and 3 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that no interference is called for under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to question maintenance orders already confirmed by a coordinate bench of this Court. The applicant's liberty to file a separate urgent application for stay in any pending recall petition is preserved.
What did the court decide?
The application was consigned to the record with liberty to the applicant to approach this Court for recall/modification of the August 25, 2017 order in a separate recall application.