Dismissed

Sheela Devi and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Allahabad HC19 Dec 2019A482/46812/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this Section 482 Cr.P.C. application challenging a summoning order and entire proceedings, the court refused to quash the case as factual disputes cannot be adjudicated at this stage. However, directing no coercive action for 45 days if applicants surrender and apply for bail.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for quashing refused; refusal of coercive measures for 45 days if applicant surrenders and applies for bail.

Sheela Devi and 3 Others Vs State of Up and Another — Quashing and FIR | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 76

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 46812 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Sheela Devi And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Anand Pati Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.

¶5

Learned counsel for the applicants is permitted to delete the name of applicant no. 4 during the course of the day.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the summoning order dated 10.01.2019 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 3272 of 2019 (State Vs. Sheela Devi and others), arising out of N.C.R. No. 131 of 2018, under Sections- 323, 504, 308 I.P.C., Police Station- Airwakatra, District- Auraiya, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Auraiya.

¶8

The contention of learned counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purpose of causing harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. At this stage, the argument raised by learned counsel for the applicants involves factual disputes and appraisal of evidence.

¶9

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants at this stage. All the submissions made at the bar, relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283 .

¶10

The prayer for quashing the entire proceeding of the aforesaid case is refused.

¶11

However, in view of the entirety of facts and circumstances of the case, it is directed that in case the applicants appear and

¶12

surrender before the court below within 45 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P.

¶13

For a period of 45 days, no coercive measure shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case.

¶14

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of .

¶15

Order Date :- 19.12.2019 Priya

Sheela Devi and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheela Devi and 3 Others v. State of Up and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Israr and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rakesh Tiwari and 4 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Smt. Kalpana @ Pinki and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ranjeet Kumar Vs State of Up and Another

Hakeem Khan @ Nannhe Khan and 2 Others Vs State of Up and Another

Anshul Anand and 3 Others Vs State of Up and Another