Single judge refused to quash prosecution proceedings under Sections 323, 504, and 506 IPC, finding no abuse of court process. Applicant granted liberty to move for discharge, and coercive measures stayed pending disposal.
Application refused; liberty granted to move for discharge; coercive measures stayed for three months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 4361 of 2019 Applicant :- Santosh And 2 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Vibha Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J .
1.Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2.This application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of complaint case No. 2358 of 2016 newly allotted No. 1097 of 2018, under Sections 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. police station Newarhiya, district Jaunpur, pending in the court of Civil Judge (S.D.)/F.T.C. Jaunpur.
O rder Date :- 1.2.2019/A. Pt. Singh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the proceedings in the complaint case under Sections 323, 504, and 506 IPC should be quashed for abuse of process of court.
Whether summing of the accused can be quashed without discharge even before framing of charges.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Santosh And 2 Ors
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
