For want of prosecution due to the absence of the applicant's counsel in the revised call list, the application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed. Any interim order stands vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 40320 of 2011
Applicant :- Mukhtar And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ganesh Prajapati Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate,R.V.Chaudhary
Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.
List has been revised. Sri R.V.Chaudhary has appeared for the opposite party. None appeared for the applicants even in the revised call.
The application is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.4.2019 IA
Mukhtar And Others
State Of U.P.
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
