Disposed

Rajendra v. State of Up and 2 Ors.

Allahabad HC18 Sept 2019A482/33983/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court refused to quash a non-bailable warrant under Section 482 Cr.PC as the case depends on disputed facts. However, it directed that no coercive action be taken for 30 days and allowed the applicant to apply for bail recall or surrender.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action for 30 days; applicant directed to apply for recall of warrant or surrender within 30 days.

Rajendra Vs State of Up and 2 Ors. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 69

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 33983 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Rajendra Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 2 Ors Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Singh Rajput Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Dhirendra Singh Rajput, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Abhinav Prasad, learned AGA for the State.

¶6

This application has been filed under section 482 Cr.PC with prayer seeking stay/quashing of the Non Bailable Warrant order dated 24.9.2018 issued by Judicial Magistrate Rath, DistrictHamirpur, in Case No. 256 of 2002 (State v. Rajendra), under section 25 Arms Act, Police Station- Rath, District- Hamirpur arising out of Case Crime No. 88 of 1993.

¶7

The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no offence against the applicant is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purpose of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.

¶8

From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicant. All the submissions made at the Bar relate to the disputed questions of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under section 482 Cr.PC. At this stage only prime facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur v. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar v. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. v. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.)283 .

¶9

The prayer for quashing the non-bailable warrant order and further proceedings in the aforesaid case pending before the court concerned is refused.

¶10

However, it is provided that if the applicant files an application for recalling of the nonbailable warrant issued against him within 30 days from today, the said application may be considered and disposed off as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law or in case, the applicant appears and surrender before the court below within 30 days from today and applies for bail the court below shall consider and decide the bail prayer of applicant in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Smt. Amarawati and another v. State of U.P., reported in 2004 (57)ALR 290, as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh and others, reported in (2009) 3 ADJ 322 (SC).

¶11

For a period of 30 days from today or till disposal of the application for grant of bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant.

¶12

However, in case, the applicant does not appear before the court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against him.

¶13

With the above directions, present application is disposed off.

¶14

Order Date :- 18.9.2019 ssm

Rajendra v. State of Up and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra v. State of Up and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Girish Kumar Pandey Vs State of U.P. and Another

Mohd. Rizwan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Ors.

Nand Kumar Sahni Vs State of U.P. and Another

Bahadur Singh and Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kamal Singh Vs State of Up and 14 Others

Mohd. Ilias and 7 Ors. Vs State of U.P. and Anr.