Dismissed

Durga Prasad Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Jun 2019A482/22720/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash proceedings for cheating and criminal breach of trust. Court refused quashing prayers but directed surrender within four weeks for bail consideration and forbade coercive action during that period.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for quashing refused. Directions given for surrender within four weeks for bail consideration and prohibition of coercive action during that period.

Durga Prasad Yadav and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and… — Property and Title | Allahabad HC (2019)

¶1

Court No. - 48

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22720 of 2019

¶3

Applicant :- Durga Prasad Yadav And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Kumar Srivastava,Navneet Lal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Ajit Singh,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A.

¶6

The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No. 516 of 2018, under Sections 406 and 420 I.P.C., P.S. Siddharth Nagar, district-Siddharthnagar and summoning order dated 8.5.2019 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar.

¶7

The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants are disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention.

¶8

Per contra learned A.G.A. Submitted that from the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. The submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants relate to disputed question of facts, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of

¶9

Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283 . The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got a right of discharge through a proper application for the said purpose and he is free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court.

¶10

The submissions made by learned A.G.A. have force.

¶11

The prayer for quashing the proceedings of the aforementioned case and the summoning order is refused.

¶12

However, it is directed that if the applicants appear and surrender before the court below within four weeks from today and apply for bail, their

¶13

prayer for bail shall be considered and decided in view of the settled law laid by this Court in the case of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2004 (57) ALR 290 as well as judgement passed by Hon'ble Apex Court reported in 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P .

¶14

For a period of four weeks from today or till the applicants surrender and apply for bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However, in case, the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.

¶15

With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed of.

¶16

Order Date :- 18.6.2019 Faridul

Durga Prasad Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Durga Prasad Yadav and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyotsana Nigam Vs State of Up and Another

Umesh Chandra @ Badkan Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Anr.

Kuwarpal @ Kumarpal and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Surat Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajesh Bharti Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shri Prakash @ Prem and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another