In this in absentia application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the High Court dismissed the plea due to non-prosecution by the applicant while counsel for the State was present. The interim order, if any, was vacated.
Application dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 17
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18620 of 2005
Applicant :- Rajiv Kumar Mishra And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prabhakar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate,Anuj Bajpai
Hon'ble Suresh Kumar Gupta,J.
List has been revised.
No one turned up on both sides to press this application while learned A.G.A. is present.
The application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Registry is directed to inform the trial court to proceed with the case in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 29.3.2019 m.a.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajiv Kumar Mishra
Anup Kumar Mishra
Suresh Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
