The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel failed to appear despite repeated calls, with no adjournment sought. Interim orders were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 17413 of 2019
Applicant :- Amarpal And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Kashyap,V.P. Singh Kashyap
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicants.
Learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 20.8.2019 AKT
Amarpal And 2 Others
Om Prakash-VII J
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
