The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. was dismissed for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the applicant despite repeated calls. The interim order was vacated.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18485 of 2019
Applicant :- Brij Bihari Tiwari Opposite Party :- State Of Up And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Joint Vakalatnama filed by Sri Radhey Shyam Yadav and Sri Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocates on behalf of opposite party no.2 is taken on record.
Cause list has been revised.
None appears on behalf of the applicants inspite of repeated calls.
There is no request for adjournment on behalf of the applicant.
Shri R. S. Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State are present.
Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Copy of this order be sent to the court concerned so that the case pending before the court below may proceed further in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 19.8.2019 AKT
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Brij Bihari Tiwari
State Of Up
Om Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
