Rinku@Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of proceedings under Section 494 IPC, the High Court refused the prayer but directed the applicant to move for discharge under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C. relief sought was dismissal of the quashing petition coupled with a stay on coercive measures pending disposal of the discharge petition.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for quashing of summoning order and proceedings refused; applicant directed to seek discharge under Section 245(2) Cr.P.C.; no coercive measures allowed pending disposal.