The application under Section 482 CrPC was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel did not appear to present the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 72
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 13443 of 2018
Applicant :- Ashok Kumar And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Praksah,Rajnikant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rajnikant Pandey
Hon'ble Rajiv Joshi,J.
List has been revised.
Nobody is present on behalf of the applicant to press the present application. Sri Rajnikant Pandey, learned counsel for the O.P. No.2 is present.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 31.7.2019
Akbar
Ashok Kumar
Rajiv Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
