The applicant sought quashing of an order rejecting a discharge application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The court dismissed the appeal as infructuous since the accused had already been acquited in the trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 66
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11171 of 2019
Applicant :- Dheerendra Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Raj Kumar Vaishya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dileep Kumar,Rajrshi Gupta
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Sri Ravindra Pratap Singh, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Ashok Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the applicant states that present application has been filed against order dated 30.01.2019, whereby his discharge application has been rejected. However, the trial has concluded and the applicant has been duly acquitted in the trial, therefore, this application has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as such.
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.12.2019 MN/-
Dheerendra Kumar
State Of U.P.
Rahul Bhargava
Rajul Bhargava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
