In this writ petition under Article 227, the High Court directed the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Basti, to decide an original suit expeditiously without expressing an opinion on the merits of the claim.
Direction to the Court below to decide the Original Suit No. 439 of 2004 expeditiously.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 36
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 9815 of 2018
Petitioner :- Lalur Prasad Pandey Respondent :- Raj Kishor Singh And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shailendra Kumar Pathak,Suresh Tripathi
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
The prayer made in the present petition is to issue a direction to the Court below namely the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), VIII, Basti to decide the Original Suit No. 439 of 2004 ( Raj Kishor & others Vs. Lalur Prasad Pandey & others ) within stipulated period.
Perused the order-sheet.
Be that as it may, without expressing any opinion on the merits of claim of the petitioner, the present petition is being disposed of with the direction to the Court below namely the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), VIII, Basti to decide the Original Suit No. 439 of 2004 ( Raj Kishor & others Vs. Lalur Prasad Pandey & others ), as expeditiously as possible.
Order Date :- 11.2.2019 Himanshu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a direction under Article 227 should be issued to decide an original suit within a stipulated period.
Lalur Prasad Pandey
Raj Kishor Singh
Sunita Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
