Palturam v. State of U.P. and 14 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought a direction under Article 227 for the trial court to decide an original suit expeditiously. The court, relying on a Division Bench precedent, rejected the request for a binding time-bound order but directed the trial court to make efforts to decide the suit without unnecessary adjournments.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed; no mandatory time-bound direction issued; trial court directed to decide suit expeditiously.