The High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging the rejection of a tenant's application to cross-examine the landlord at this interlocutory stage.
Application for cross-examination of the landlord is not allowed at this stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 19
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 77 of 2019
Petitioner :- Nikhil Jain @ Appu Jain Respondent :- Smt. Manju Yadav @ Yadu Counsel for Petitioner :- Chaudhary Subhash Kumar
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
By impugned order the application filed by the petitioner for cross-examination of the landlord has been rejected. This Court is not inclined to entertain a challenge at this stage in exercise of supervisory power under Article 227 of the Constitution.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Order Date :- 8.1.2019
skv
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the supervisory power under Article 227 justifies entertaining a challenge to a rejected application for cross-examination of the landlord.
Nikhil Jain @ Appu Jain
Smt. Manju Yadav @ Yadu
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
