In a matter under Article 227 regarding a suit property dispute, the court disposed of the petition based on a joint affidavit stating that the parties had entered into a compromise involving withdrawal of the suit and criminal cases, with respondents paying Rs. 2 lakhs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5262 of 2019
Petitioner :- Smt. Shila Yadav Respondent :- Padma Kant Pandey And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Saurabh Raj Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- Jitendra Kumar Srivastava,Ramesh Chandra Tiwari,Satya Prakash
Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.
The parties have filed joint affidavit of plaintiff-petitioner and respondents no. 6 and 7 (subsequent purchasers of the suit property). It is stated in the said affidavit that the parties have entered into a compromise where-under the plaintiff-petitioner has agreed to withdraw the suit out of which the instant proceedings arises as well as the criminal cases pending between them. The defendants-respondents are stated to have paid a sum of Rs. 2 lakhs as compensation to the plaintiff-petitioner.
Counsel for the parties also state that the parties have settled of their disputes by compromise.
Accordingly, no further adjudication is required to be made in the instant petition. It stands disposed of in terms of the compromise between the parties.
Order Date :- 26.9.2019 VR
(Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.)
Smt. Shila Yadav
Padma Kant Pandey And 7 Others
Manoj Kumar Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
