This civil writ petition sought expeditious disposal of O.S. No. 394 of 2016. The court found the petitioner's oral contention regarding a pending temporary injunction application unsupported by material record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3369 of 2019
Petitioner :- Meera Devi Respondent :- Civil Judge And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Purushottam Upadhyay
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
The only prayer addressed on this petition is for expeditious disposal of O.S. No. 394 of 2016.
Although learned counsel for the petitioner has orally contended that his application for grant of temporary injunction has not yet been disposed of, no such material has been placed on the record. The Court finds itself unable to countenance this submission more so in light of the fact that the suit itself is pending at the stage of framing of issues.
In view of the above, this petition shall stand disposed of with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division) Chandauli to endeavour to dispose of O.S. No. 394 of 2016 with expedition and without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of parties.
Order Date :- 30.4.2019 faraz
Meera Devi
Civil Judge
Yashwant Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
