The petitioner withdrew the writ petition on the ground that the cause of action did not survive. The High Court dismissed the writ petition without reasoning, as it was no longer resisted.
Petitioner's request to withdraw the writ petition was accepted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 16
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 58904 of 2010
Petitioner :- C/M Vijay Nath Ram Shekhar Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- R.M. Saggi,V.P.Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Satish Madhyan,Sunita Agarwal,Sunita Agrawal
Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Sri V. P. Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause of action on which the instant writ petition was founded does not survive. The petitioner does not wish to prosecute the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 23.10.2018 Dhananjai
C/M Vijay Nath Ram Shekhar Mishra
State Of U.P.
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
