Anurag Singh v. State of U.P. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 552 of 2018…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 552 of 2018…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 552 of 2018
Petitioner :- Anurag Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Amresh Singh,Santosh Kumar
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The sole relief pressed for by learned counsel for the petitioner at the time of hearing for the writ petition is that the application 28 October 2017 submitted before the before the District Magistrate, Saharanpur regarding operation of the mid-day meal account may be decided.
Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Shri Santosh Kumar has put an appearance on behalf of respondent nos. 3 and 4 state that a decision shall be decided at an early date on the application filed by the petitioner.
This petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to the District Magistrate to take a decision on the application filed by the petitioner expeditiously and preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is filed by the petitioner after hearing the parties concerned.
It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated on the merits of the matter and it will be for the District Magistrate to take a decision in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 8.1.2018 A. V. Singh
(Dilip Gupta,J.)
(Jayant Banerji,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed to direct the District Magistrate to decide the application filed by the petitioner regarding the mid-day meal account.
Anurag Singh
State Of U.P.
Dilip Gupta
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court