The High Court dismissed a special appeal after condonation of delay was rejected. The application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act was dismissed due to non-appearance, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 39
Case :- SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 3 of 2014
Appellant :- Pawan Kumar Respondent :- Union Of India And 5 Ors. Counsel for Appellant :- Ram Sagar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,A.S.G.I. (2013/8535),Adarsh Kumar Pandey
Hon'ble Dilip Gupta,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Civil Misc. Delay Condonation Application No.1356 of 20..
List has been revised. No one appears to press the application filed for condoning the delay in filing the Special Appeal.
The application is, accordingly, rejected.
Order on memo of Appeal
As the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act is rejected, the Appeal stands dismissed.
Order Date :- 5.1.2018
NSC
(Dilip Gupta, J.)
(Jayant Banerji, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for condonation of delay in filing a special appeal should be allowed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pawan Kumar
Union Of India And 5 Ors.
Dilip Gupta
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
