Awadhesh Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed in default as respondent's counsel appeared but petitioner failed to appear before the court on 3.7.2018.
Writ petition dismissed in default as respondent's counsel appeared but petitioner failed to appear before the court on 3.7.2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 50682 of 2012
Petitioner :- Awadhesh Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Secy. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Arjun Prasad Yadav,R.B. Yadav
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Gupta,J.
The list has been revised. Even though Sri R.B. Yadav, learned counsel for the respondents is present but none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 3.7.2018
vinay
Awadhesh Kumar
Secy. And Others
Shashi Kant Gupta
Rajiv Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court