Dismissing the writ petition as the petitioner raised a private dispute against non-parties, ruling that redressal should be sought in a civil suit.
Writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4298 of 2018
Petitioner :- Azharul Islam Beg Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajiv Sisodia,Dhirendra Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The prayer sought in this petition is against the private respondents who have not even been made parties.
If the petitioner has a private dispute, it is open to him to seek his redressal in a civil suit. We are not inclined to interfere in the matter.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 14.11.2018 SK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court can interfere in a private dispute when private respondents are not impleaded.
Azharul Islam Beg
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
