The High Court dismissed this writ petition seeking directions to make constructions on land. The court observed that the petitioner failed to disclose any title and noted the presence of disputed questions of fact, declining to interfere.
Petition dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37286 of 2018
Petitioner :- Arman Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Dwivedi,Deepankar Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The petitioner fails to disclose whether he has any right or title over the land he is seeking to make constructions. He, however, seeks directions from all over.
We are not inclined to interfere in this matter as this petition is full of disputed questions of fact.
The Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs.
Order Date :- 14.11.2018 S.P.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should interfere in a writ petition where the petitioner lacks disclosed title over the land sought to be constructed upon.
Whether the writ petition warrants interference when it contains disputed questions of fact.
Arman Ahmad
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Bharati Sapru
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
