The Wright petition regarding non-release of work payment due to pending enquiry was dismissed. The court refused interim direction and advised filing a suit for remedy.
Petitioner advised to file a suit for release of payment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4284 of 2018
Petitioner :- M/S P.B. Enterprises And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parmatma Nand Ojha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Vivek Saran
Hon'ble Tarun Agarwala,J. Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, we find that the payments for the work done has not been released on account of a pending enquiry.
We are not inclined to issue any direction to the authority to release payment at this stage.
The writ petition is dismissed.
It will be open to the petitioner to file a suit for release of the payment.
Order Date :- 1.2.2018 MAA/-
(Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) (Taraun Agarwala,J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should direct the release of payments pending an enquiry.
M/S P.B. Enterprises And Another
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Saumitra Dayal Singh
Tarun Agarwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
