Single judge High Court dismissed a revision against a writ petition. The court observed no grounds existed for revival of the petitioner's non-performing rice mill and refused all reliefs sought.
Lower court order refusing revival of petitioner's factory was upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 4121 of 2014
Petitioner :- M/S Chauhan Rice Mills Respondent :- The Commissioner, Meerut Region And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shiv Sagar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sudha Pandey
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Called in revise. None appeared to press the writ petition. Smt. Sudha Pandey, learned counsel for the respondent is present. In the circumstances, we ourselves have perused the record.
By means of the present writ petition, petitioners have sought following reliefs:
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to facilitate all necessary help for revival of the petitioner's until which has been declared as none performing assets on account of incident caused by the fire.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the proposal of revival forthwith."
Having gone through the entire writ petition, we do not find any ground entitling the petitioners for grant of any of above reliefs. No interference, therefore, is called for.
Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 3.12.2018
Manish Tripathi
M/S Chauhan Rice Mills
The Commissioner, Meerut Region
4 Others
Shashi Kant Gupta
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
