The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of pressing as the petitioner failed to annex the agreement or reply, allowing a fresh filing.
Petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 39131 of 2018
Petitioner :- M/S K. C. Industries And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ved Byas Mishra
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has neither annexed the copy of the agreement nor any reply filed before the concerned authority.
In view of above, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to file a fresh.
This order has been passed in presence of Sri Ved Byas Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent no.5.
Order Date :- 30.11.2018 S.Ali
M/S K. C. Industries And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Shashi Kant Gupta
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
