Disposed

Trilochan Singh v. State of U P and 03 Others

Allahabad HC14 Nov 2018WRIC/37296/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought abeyance of recovery proceedings due to inability to pay loan installments. Court, noting willingness to pay, placed recovery proceedings on hold contingent on payment of dues in specified installments. Writ petition disposed of with directions for installment repayment scheme.

What did the court decide?

Recovery proceedings placed in abeyance contingent on payment of entire dues with interest in specified installments. Recovery charges waived if deposits are made as per schedule.

Trilochan Singh Vs State of U P and 03… — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Allahabad HC (2018)

¶1

Court No. - 36

¶2

Case :- WRIT - C No. - 37296 of 2018 Petitioner :- Trilochan Singh Respondent :- State Of U P And 03 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Parshuram Chaubey

¶3

Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Parshuram Chaubey, learned counsel for the respondent Bank.

¶5

The petitioner had taken a loan and was unable to pay the installments on time. Consequently, recovery proceedings have been instituted to recover the balance amount.

¶6

There is no illegality in the recovery proceeding but the petitioner contends that he is willing to pay the entire amount in installments.

¶7

Learned Standing Counsel as well as counsel for the Bank are agreeable to the prayer made by the petitioner provided he repays the entire dues with interest regularly.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts, the writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:-

¶9

The recovery proceedings shall remain in abeyance provided;

¶10

(1) The petitioner pays the entire outstanding amount with up-to-date interest in equal installments to be deposited before the bank authorities.

¶11

(2) The first installment of Rs.50,000/- shall be paid within a period of one month from today.

¶12

(3) On deposit of the first installment, the respondent bank would furnish the complete statement of accounts showing all the deposits which have been made by the petitioner till date and the balance amount payable.

¶13

(4) Rest of the amount shall be deposited by the petitioner in six quarterly installments.

¶14

(5) Any amount already deposited shall be given adjustment.

¶15

(6) The petitioner shall make deposit of the last installment along with upto-date interest.

¶16

(7) In the event of default in any of the installments, it would be open to the respondents to recover the amount forthwith.

¶17

(8) As only the citation has yet been issued and the recovery has not been proceeded with, it is,therefore, directed that, in case, the petitioner makes deposit as per the schedule above, no recovery charges shall be realised from him.

¶18

Order Date :- 14.11.2018/Jyotsana

Trilochan Singh v. State of U P and 03 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Trilochan Singh v. State of U P and 03 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Hari Prakash Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. and Another

The Management Board Windsor Park Residents Welfare Association through Its v.P., Mr.Viplav Sharma Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Oriental Insurance Company Limited, Rampur Vs Smt. Rekha and 2 Others

Smt. Ahilya Yadav Vs State of U P and Another

Upahar Jaiswal Vs State of U.P. and Another

M/S Bombay Chemical Industries Vs Presiding Officer Labour Court and 2 Others