The petitioner withdrew the writ petition as a petition against the same matter was already pending where an amendment application would state subsequent actions. The writ petition was dismissed.
The writ petition is dismissed as the petitioner does not wish to press it further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 36429 of 2018
Petitioner :- Smt.Sadhna Maurya Respondent :- Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Gupta,Manoj Kumar Singh Vats Counsel for Respondent :- Vikas Budhwar
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Heard Sri Ashutosh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vikas Budhwar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-Corporation.
At the very outset learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not wish to press this writ petition any further as a writ petition is already pending against the same advertisement in which he will file an amendment application stating the subsequent action by the Corporation.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
Order Date :- 1.11.2018 SKM
(Ajay Bhanot,J.) (Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
Smt. Sadhna Maurya
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. And 2 Others
Abhinava Upadhya
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
