The High Court of Uttar Pradesh declared the writ petition infructuous and dismissed it, vacating any interim order, in a one-line final order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1992 of 2016
Petitioner :- Jagdish Prasad Sonkar Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Govind Narain Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sambhavi Nandan
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J.
Sri Govind Narain Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
It is accordingly dismissed.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 1.11.2018 Ashish Tripathi
(Ajay Bhanot,J.) ( Abhinava Upadhya,J.)
Jagdish Prasad Sonkar
State Of U.P.
Another
Abhinava Upadhya
Ajay Bhanot
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
