Writ petition dismissed as outlived its utility since the petitioner was absent after receiving a revised order, making the matter non-substantive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 34962 of 2013
Petitioner :- Smt. Radhika Tharania And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- F.N. Dubey,Prashant Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Even in the revised, none is present.
The matter relates to protection. It appears that after getting first order, this petition has outlived its utility, therefore, the petitioner and their counsel are not present.
Hence, this petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 20.8.2018
Praveen
Smt. Radhika Tharania
Radhika Tharania Another
State Of U.P.
4 Others
Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
