Court dismissed a writ petition for protection as it had outlived its utility since the petitioner and counsel were absent, noting no one was present to argue.
Petition dismissed due to non-appearance of petitioner and outlived utility.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17207 of 2014
Petitioner :- Shri Rinku & Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. & 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- V.S. Parmar,Hari Om Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Dr. Kaushal Jayendra Thaker,J.
Even in the revised, none is present.
The matter relates to protection. It appears that after getting first order, this petition has outlived its utility, therefore, the petitioner and their counsel are not present.
Hence, this petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 20.8.2018
Praveen
Rinku & Another
State Of U.P.
Other
Kaushal Jayendra Thaker
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
